A few local media outlets have picked up interest in my book since I announced it was available for pre-sale on twitter and this blog. On the one hand, this is great! I really welcome the exposure for both the book and the ideas it contains. On the other hand, I worry (together with my publisher’s media rep) about too much early exposure before the book is actually available (October!). I don’t really know what the right balance is – we don’t get a lot of media training in academia – but I’ll keep working on figuring it out. In the meantime, I ask for patience from interested reporters with my ham-fisted efforts to manage the roll out of the book and its ideas, and I’m hopeful interest continues into when the book is actually ready to fall into readers’ hands.
For now here’s the audio clip from a recent interview talking about my forthcoming book with Stephen Quinn on CBC’s On The Coast. (Or you can just listen to the whole August 11th, 2016 show). I’m a regular listener, so it was really fun to meet Stephen Quinn and Amy Bell and see the inside of the CBC studio. [Update: and here’s the CBC write-up].
Prior to the radio interview, Jen St. Denis also interviewed me about the book for the Metro News, in a nice little piece posted here. I think the piece was good, but it’s worth making two quick clarifications:
1) The 80% of land base figure speaks to 80% of land set aside to support residential uses (rather than 80% of all land as a whole), and covers the municipality of Vancouver. Metro Vancouver has data on land use broken down by municipality (and a lot of other data besides!) Also Jens von Bergmann over at MountainMath (mentioned in the piece) has a beautiful map breaking down land use by lot within the City of Vancouver, which everyone should check out. It really demonstrates just how much land has been set aside for single-family detached houses (almost entirely in protected RS zones, though there are also duplexes in RT zones and houses in Shaughnessy included, along with a scattering of old houses remaining in places unprotected by zoning).
2) The accompanying photo for the piece, as multiple people have pointed out, looks like it was taken at Mole Hill, which is a lovely little development preserving and rehabilitating old houses downtown by subdividing them up into apartments. To be clear, the census would not consider these to be single-family detached houses, nor would the city. But the ambiguity of how they LOOK like houses (and very photogenic ones at that) is really interesting. This speaks to the focus of my first chapter in the book, laying out just what we talk about when we talk about single-family detached houses, and how the legal categories don’t always match people’s lay understandings of what counts as a house. It also speaks to the many possibilities for subdividing existing houses to support more households – if zoning laws were modified to allow such a thing (it’s already the case, of course, that most RS zoned lots in Vancouver can now already support up to three households through secondary suite and laneway housing provisions).